A few questions...

...inspired by this story:

• How stupid do you have to be to try to carjack someone in the parking lot of a store that sells self-defense firearms AND ammunition?
• What is it antis always say about the attacker taking your gun and using it against you? It seems that NEVER pans out that way. In fact, you more often see it working the OTHER way. Why is that?
• Would there have been ANY chance of the defender being charged if he did NOT have a Texas CHL?
• Is that moral, right or just? Why should the right of self-defense be limited only to those who have the financial wherewithal to jump through those hoops?

Thoughts?